Hi Reuben, Thanks for the report.
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:30:53PM CEST: > "None of these rules do support" -> "None of these rules supports" > > (Two corrections: "do" is redundant, "None" is singular.) Hmm, I guess. I needed to look at <http://www.llrx.com/columns/grammar1.htm> for a bit of support, though. Then I found another instance of "none". Cheers, Ralf 2008-08-19 Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (tiny patch) * doc/automake.texi (Flag Variables Ordering, Per-Object Flags): Fix grammaro. diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi index eccbc5d..265a3f8 100644 --- a/doc/automake.texi +++ b/doc/automake.texi @@ -10419,7 +10419,7 @@ DejaGnu tests (@pxref{Tests}) use @code{RUNTESTDEFAULTFLAGS} and (@pxref{Tags}) use @code{ETAGSFLAGS}, @code{AM_ETAGSFLAGS}, @code{CTAGSFLAGS}, and @code{AM_CTAGSFLAGS}. Java rules (@pxref{Java}) use @code{JAVACFLAGS} and @code{AM_JAVACFLAGS}. None -of these rules do support per-target flags (yet). +of these rules supports per-target flags (yet). To some extent, even @code{AM_MAKEFLAGS} (@pxref{Subdirectories}) obeys this naming scheme. The slight difference is that @@ -10516,7 +10516,7 @@ sources of the @emph{program} @code{foo}, it has nothing to do with @file{foo.c} or @file{foo-foo.o} specifically. What if @file{foo.c} needs to be compiled into @file{foo.o} using some -specific flags, that none of the other files require? Obviously +specific flags, that none of the other files requires? Obviously per-program flags are not directly applicable here. Something like per-object flags are expected, i.e., flags that would be used only when creating @file{foo-foo.o}. Automake does not support that,