tags 13435 + moreinfo patch thanks On 03/05/2013 08:43 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > I won't hold you up. Since none of my folks thought it important > enough to take the time to test it, please just back-burner it. If > someone here needs the patch, they know where to find it. > OK. I just find it a pity to throw away DJGPP support at this point, since it turned out that the code needed to support it was really simple after all.
Anyway, in the meantime I'm marking this report as "more info needed" (where such info is the result of the needed test exposure). I'll close the report as "wontfix" a couple of months in the future if nobody has reported anything by then. Thanks, and best regards, Stefano