Hello Yves, demerphq <demer...@gmail.com> writes:
> Also I observe that there were previous patches to ensure most uses of > keys() were sorted. However not all of them, including diagnostics, > and various other places where the key order could be exposed to a > user. > > Attached is a patch that I believe fixes any remaining uses of unsorted keys. > > I took the policy that automake is not performance sensitive, at least > at the level of sorting keys, and that sorting something that is not > strictly necessary does no harm. > > I admit I have not been able to properly test all of these changes, > but superficial testing does not reveal any issues. > > Anyway, sorry for the misleading original bug-report. > > Cheers, > Yves Can you explain what would be the benefit for Automake to have such deterministic behavior? Thanks for the report. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
