I would normally use an f-string or str.format() but I wanted to keep ancient Python version support. So I went with %-formatting. I've seen %u somewhere in the codebase already instead of %d, so I've decided to keep it consistent -- apparently I have failed and used %d in one of the places anyway (habbit, I guess), thanks for catching it, Karl.
- bug#44239: [PATCH] Python double-digit version detection br... Patrik Novotny
- bug#44239: [PATCH] Python double-digit version detecti... Karl Berry
- bug#44239: [PATCH] Python double-digit version det... Miro Hrončok
- bug#44239: [PATCH] Python double-digit version... Karl Berry
- bug#44239: [PATCH] Python double-digit ver... Miro Hrončok