Hi! > Le 9 sept. 2021 à 00:32, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit : > > On 9/8/21 2:18 PM, Karl Berry wrote: >> Just an idea that I don't expect you to adopt, but just to mention -- >> you could only institute the breaking change if POSIXLY_CORRECT. That's >> why POSIXLY_CORRECT exists. -k > > I like this idea. It insulates us against POSIX decisions and/or indecisions > in this area.
Good with me. I'll implement that, thanks Karl! >> P.S. Is this related to Automake? If it is, as with Autoconf, there >> needs to be new volunteer effort to do what's needed. I can't take it on >> and unfortunately no one else has come forward. IMHO the prototypes in Automake's test suite are wrong: I see no reason for yyerror to take a char *, and we do pass constant strings to it, so I'm quite surprised that there are no compiling errors about it. We should fix that. I can do that. On the Autoconf side, we dearly need some AC_CHECK_BISON. It is really a pity that everybody uses AC_CHECK_YACC, which seriously degrades the point of using bison. Cheers!
