On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:08, William Park wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 07:33:14PM -0500, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, William Park wrote: > > >Let's see... > > > a-{b{d,e}}-c > > > a-{bd,be}-c > > > a-bd-c a-be-c > > > > > >It looks okey, I think. > > > > Except that b{d,e} expands to 'bd be', not 'bd,be'. > > Hmm... no. Internally,
arguing for what goes on internally shouldnt have bearing on what the user result is ... and in this case, the user result would be as Chris says imho -mike _______________________________________________ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash