Le 10/01/2011 17:05, Roman Rakus a écrit : > I will say the same on both lists - why to execute another process if > you can do the same in the current one? No gain.
Not every "for" loop is in the critical path. Especially not in shell script.
- for; do; done regression ? Alexander Tiurin
- Huge execution time in 4.2, WAS: for; do; done regre... Jan Schampera
- Re: Huge execution time in 4.2, WAS: for; do; do... Chet Ramey
- Re: Huge execution time in 4.2, WAS: for; do... Jan Schampera
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Chet Ramey
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Chet Ramey
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Eric Blake
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Greg Wooledge
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Marc Herbert
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Roman Rakus
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Marc Herbert
- Re: for; do; done regression ? Jan Schampera
