On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 20:12, Jon Seymour <jon.seym...@gmail.com> wrote: > You don't have to do that - the timestamp is encoded in a "comment" > line between entries. See the example below. One could simply assume > all lines between two lines beginning with # are part of the one > entry,
That's what I was saying. However, it seems like an unrobust way have handling the situation (both for multi-line comments and for the existing timestamp purposes).
