On 14 Jul 2015 11:35, Pierre Gaston wrote: > I think adoption would be difficult considering even a useful loadable > builtin like "finfo" has not found its way into default installations, but > for instance I can imagine bash programmable completion could go another > level with an embedded interpreter that lets you access the readline > internals.
finfo is under the "examples" directory, and all of the loadable logic isn't exactly trivial to package. it feels kind of bolted on, especially when you try to build & install things. if we want the loadables to be more of a first class concept than something people only play around with locally on their own systems, this needs polishing. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
