On 11/7/16 4:49 AM, Dan Douglas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
>> On 11/1/16 5:57 AM, Dan Douglas wrote:
>>> On a possibly related note, would you consider adjusting +, :+, -, :-,
>>> as in "${var[@]+word}" to align with the meaning of [[ -v var[@] ]] as
>>> discussed in
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-11/msg00099.html
>>> ?
>>
>> There's not a compelling reason to break backwards compatibility or to be
>> unnecessarily incompatible with other shells that implement that construct,
>> like ksh93.
>
> I kind of doubt anybody would know what to expect with them. :+ and :-
> are particularly weird (they don't quite have to do with testing for
> defined variable admittedly).
This is probably true. I think all the shells with arrays try to treat
${a[@]} in the same way as $@, which gets strange in a "scalar" context.
There was a pretty extensive discussion of the $@ issue on the austin-
group mailing list, which revealed big differences in how shells expand
$@ in a "non-list" context. I think those differences are reflected in
how those shells expand ${a[@]}.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
