On 05 Mar 2018 14:33, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 3/5/18 1:15 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 02 Mar 2018 14:25, Chet Ramey wrote: > >> On 2/27/18 11:46 AM, don fong wrote: > >>> Chet, thanks for the suggestion. > >>> > >>> i still wonder what's the objection to changing .gitignore? > >> > >> I don't think it will be useful to me, since I curate the commits I > >> make to the various branches, but I don't have any real objection if > >> it will help others. > > > > i wish the bash/readline git repos had .gitignore in them so every > > dev didn't have to create it by hand themselves > > OK, since the bash devel branch has one, I assume you mean the master > branches for bash/readline?
all the active branches that people would normally use :) so yeah, master & devel would be great, and as new branches are cut off of master/devel, they'll get them for free. i don't think there's any need to backport to older stuff. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
