>
>
> > https://pastebin.com/cV1jP41Y
>
> Really? What is your analysis? There are 100 duplicate global symbols
> shared between bash and other libraries? Or is it your assertion that
> one should never use the same symbol names, unconditionally? You're not
> making much of a point here.


It is the duplicated definitions among all the files in the source
directory, not just the ones in the package root directory versus the ones
below the root directory. The first column is the symbol, the second column
is the files where a symbol is defined. You can check some examples to see
if the analysis result makes sense.

>
> --
Regards,
Peng

Reply via email to