On 12/18/19 3:13 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:08:20PM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>> So all bash needs to do to print {Z..a} is to take Z == ASCII decimal 90
>> and a == ASCII decimal 97, then enumerate the numbers 90-97 and
>> translate them into ascii. No locale awareness is needed, no heuristics,
>> no invocation of the locale subsystem, you don't even need to hardcode
>> the ASCII range in source code.
>
> Until you want to use bash on an EBCDIC system. ;-)Oof, that was mean. :p (Also, why does this still exist.) (But I guess we all realize that this just means bash needs to rely on the existing support for translating the ASCII locale, and still doesn't need to enumerate a lookup code of characters for this especial purpose.) >> And that's why bash can support enumerating a range of ASCII characters >> in LC_COLLATE=C order, when it cannot (easily) do so using other locales. > > Yup. > -- Eli Schwartz Arch Linux Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
