On 2/17/21 6:40 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
It isn't all that hard, but isn't trivial
either, and amounts to quite a bit of code
(and parsing all the bash extensions the
way it does would make it harder and bigger)
Why would I write an entirely new parser when I already have one that works
just fine?
ps: I am sure Chet will confirm that I am not
shy about pointing out bash bugs/defects that
shoukd be fixed when I come accross one.
Can confirm.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
