On 2/17/21 6:40 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
It isn't all that hard, but isn't trivial either, and amounts to quite a bit of code (and parsing all the bash extensions the way it does would make it harder and bigger)
Why would I write an entirely new parser when I already have one that works just fine?
ps: I am sure Chet will confirm that I am not shy about pointing out bash bugs/defects that shoukd be fixed when I come accross one.
Can confirm. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/