> 2021年3月13日(土) 8:06 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmb...@gmail.com>:
>> but using it resulted sometimes output of code of the script in the output
>> of the files
>> removing exec made it work normally as supposed
One possibility is a typo, using "<<" rather than "<".
Koichi Murase <myoga.mur...@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't know about `socat', but maybe it's just the file descriptor
> collision. One needs to make sure that the file descriptor is not yet
> used when a new file descriptor is opened. For example, in Bash
> scripts, one should use the file descriptor 3--9 if you manually
> specify it because the file descriptors larger than 9 may be already
> used for other purposes.
bash has the useful ability to select an unused file descriptor, such as
exec {new_descr}>wherever
That opens the file "wherever" for writing on some previously closed
file descriptor and assigns the number to the variable "new_descr".
After that you can do
echo >&$new_descr
etc.
Dale
