-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox. Dec 21, 2021, 23:35 by chet.ra...@case.edu: > On 12/21/21 6:12 PM, fatiparty--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again > SHell wrote: > >> It is still something that needs fixing. Cannot see that it is described in >> the bash manual. No mention of %s %d %o and related things. Certainly not >> in the link you included. >> > > It's not a bug. There is no need to duplicate information from printf(1) > and printf(3) in the bash man page. That's how you push the man `page' > over 200 pages. > > If you want to read about the format specifiers, the first link from > Lawrence's message is authoritative. > Is printf an external program to bash? In this age, one uses a simple search on a manual rather than reading the 200 pages. > On my system, `man -s 1 printf' and `man -s 3 printf' produce the information > you want. >
Format specifier for printf in manual
fatiparty--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:48:23 -0800
- Format specifi... fatiparty--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
- Re: Forma... Lawrence Velázquez
- Format sp... fatiparty--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell