2023年2月5日(日) 11:12 Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au>: > | In the previous time that I raised the discussion about ``no-argument > | return in trap handlers'', I directly posted an email to the mailing > | list [1]. Fortunately, I got about ten replies but later, > | unfortunately, it was finally forgotten without any conclusion. > > Yes, discussions on the mailing list alone tend to end up going nowhere.
Thank you for the kind advice. I have sent an email to the chair, Andrew Josey. > They're also useful for long discussions about issues that have been > raised, which don't really belong in the mantis database. Such > discussions can be used to alter opinions and provide information which > can be, and often is, used when decisions are made about the issue. > They can also get issues believed to be closed reopened. Now I think I understand the relationship between the mailing list and the issue tracker better than before. Thank you for the explanation. > Enter it as an "enhancement" request (when you get to do it). That's > for things where the standard could be made better, but which aren't > actual defects. Thank you. I'll select it. > That's unlikely to happen over the weekend, but if you send e-mail now, > there's no reason it couldn't get done Monday or Tuesday. Thank you for the information. After I manage to get an account, I'll try to create an issue. It might be hard to finally make a change in the standard, but I would like to see what comes out. Thank you! -- Koichi