On 7/18/24 4:44 PM, konsolebox wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:02 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:On 7/11/24 3:51 AM, konsolebox wrote:On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:08 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:and the BASH_SOURCE absolute pathname discussion has been bananas, so that's not going in any time soon.Maybe just create BASH_SOURCE_REAL instead to avoid the gripes.I don't think so. It's not very useful to have two variables that are so similar -- it's needless overhead.So I guess it's really now just about BASH_SOURCE. What's the final decision on this? I don't think waiting for more input would make a difference.
The best path forward is to enable the behavior with a new shell option,
initially disabled.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
