On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 16:45:19 +1000, Duncan Roe via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell wrote: > `ls -1 [0-5]*` should produce the same output as `ls -1` but instead:- > > | $ ls -1 [0-5]* > | 0.txt > | ⁰.txt > | ₀.txt > | 1.txt > | ₁.txt > | 2.txt > | ₂.txt > | 3.txt > | ₃.txt > | 4.txt > | ⁴.txt > | ₄.txt > > superscripts ¹, ² & ³ are missing.
The ordering of characters within your locale is controlled by the authors of your locale (I'm guessing you're on GNU/Linux, so it would be the GNU libc maintainers in your case). > GNU bash, version 5.3.3(1)-release[a8a1c2fa] (x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) (Yeah, Slackware uses glibc as far as I know.) If you believe there's a bug in the locale, you'll have to take it up with the GNU libc maintainers.
