Le Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 10:20:17AM -0500, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> The point is NEITHER one of them does what everyone expects.
>
> hobbit:~$ kv=(one 1 two 2 "two and a half" 2.5 three 3)
>
> hobbit:~$ declare -A aa=("${kv[@]}"); declare -p aa
> declare -A aa=(["one 1 two 2 two and a half 2.5 three 3"]="" )
>
> hobbit:~$ declare -A aa="("${kv[@]}")"; declare -p aa
> declare -A aa=([3]="" [a]="half" [two]="and" [2.5]="three" [one]="1" )
>
> Both of these are "wrong" from the point of view of everybody but Chet.
> It doesn't appear this is going to change.
>
> The only known workaround is to abandon this approach entirely, and use
> @K plus eval instead.
I'm not sure how to correctly use @K for this!
My solution is to use `%q` of printf and a temporary string:
$ kv=(one 1 two 2 "two and a half" 2.5 empty '' three 3)
$ printf -v tmpString '[%q]=%q ' "${kv[@]}"
$ declare -A "aa=($tmpString)"
$ declare -p aa
declare -A aa=([empty]="" [two]="2" ["two and a half"]="2.5" [three]="3"
[one]="1" )
--
Félix Hauri - <[email protected]> - http://www.f-hauri.ch
