------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-05-22 14:13 ------- Subject: Re: recent change makes bootstrap / 'make install' fail
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:10:48PM -0000, schwinge at nic-nac-project dot de wrote: > I don't think so: > > #v+ > --- Tbinutils-2_16-branch/src/bfd/doc/Makefile.am 2005-05-21 > 10:57:33.000000000 +0200 > +++ THEAD/src/bfd/doc/Makefile.am 2005-05-21 16:47:09.000000000 +0200 > @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ > > MKDOC = chew$(EXEEXT_FOR_BUILD) > > +INCLUDES = -I.. -I$(srcdir)/.. -I$(srcdir)/../../include \ > + -I$(srcdir)/../../intl -I../../intl > + Note that $(INCLUDES) is missing from the 2.16 branch and present on HEAD. I didn't notice this until I saw your report. > Why did you make $(MKDOC) depend on chew.c and not chew.o, like it was > before? That was the whole point of the patch. This way there are no common temporary files between possible parallel builds of chew. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=960 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
