> If so, the market will decide; is a corrected ld favored or not. It's already decided: your proposed change would break the ABI, hence break binary compatibility by definition.
> That's the marvel. Why was this not corrected 20 years ago? Because, if you really think about it, the current definition of R_386_PC32 is the right one. > Are you saying, "Linux cannot be improved?" Seems so. IMHO, > not good public relations re promoting the OS. Again, it's not Linux, the i386 ABI predates Linux, Linux only conformed to the existing ABI. -- Eric Botcazou _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
