------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-02-07 17:51 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Regarding comment #2 and #3, I think the purpose of noprefix is to *allow* > source to omit the "%" prefix, ie. make the prefix optional. I don't think it > should force you to omit the prefix, especially in AT&T mode.
I don't mind keeping the current behavior for "noprefix". But we should update manual and add a couple testcases for both Intel and AT&T modes. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3993 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
