Rather than reporting 'suffix or operands invalid ...' on all three instructions when there is no operand size specifier on the memory operand, 'ambiguous operand size ...' should be reported - the former message implies that a memory operand may not be used at all here:
.intel_syntax noprefix .text Start: vcvtpd2dq xmm0, [ecx] vcvtpd2ps xmm0, [ecx] vcvttpd2dq xmm0, [ecx] -- Summary: wrong diagnostic for vcvtpd2dq/vcvtpd2ps/vcvttpd2dq Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jbeulich at novell dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6518 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils