I spotted then following lines in objdump output:
4: 0f 94 84 24 20 10 00 sete 0x1020(%esp)
b: 00
Instruction 'sete 0x1020(%esp)' is correct, but the following 00 byte still
belongs to 'sete' instruction.
I believe that the correct fix for all such issues is to make 'as' and 'objdump'
to work off the same instruction definitions.
--
Summary: Wrong disassembly printed by 'objdump' for i386 'sete'
instruction beginning with '0f 94'
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: yuri at tsoft dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9983
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
