I spotted then following lines in objdump output: 4: 0f 94 84 24 20 10 00 sete 0x1020(%esp) b: 00
Instruction 'sete 0x1020(%esp)' is correct, but the following 00 byte still belongs to 'sete' instruction. I believe that the correct fix for all such issues is to make 'as' and 'objdump' to work off the same instruction definitions. -- Summary: Wrong disassembly printed by 'objdump' for i386 'sete' instruction beginning with '0f 94' Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: yuri at tsoft dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9983 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils