------- Additional Comments From dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
2009-04-01 17:40 -------
Hi Nick,
=== ld tests ===
@@ -343,10 +343,6 @@ Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/tests
Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-frv/frv-elf.exp ...
Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-frv/tls.exp ...
Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-gc/gc.exp ...
-FAIL: Check --gc-section
-FAIL: Check --gc-section/-q
-FAIL: Check --gc-section/-r/-e
-FAIL: Check --gc-section/-r/-u
Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-h8300/h8300.exp ...
Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/testsuite/ld-ia64/ia64.exp ...
@@ -426,8 +422,8 @@ Running /usr/build/src-binutils/ld/tests
=== ld Summary ===
-# of expected passes 77
-# of unexpected failures 6
+# of expected passes 76
+# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 7
# of unsupported tests 2
/usr/build/obj-binutils/ld/ld-new 2.19.51.20090401
ad...@ubik /usr/build/obj-binutils
Your patch works fine, please commit it. The loss of one PASS is caused by the
removal of the "--gc-sections -r without -e" test, which was emitting the
appropriate error message even though gc would not have been performed even with
the required -e (or -u) flag.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
