------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-08-07 
10:06 -------
Thanks, I'm now convinced you are using a new ld.  :)  Hmm, the -v output also
shows that gcc is passing --relax to ld anyway, so the automatic --relax code
isn't even a factor.  I don't know what else to suggest.  I know --relax works
for me.  If you make all the objects and libraries used by the failing link
available to me, I'll try linking them here.  (Add -Wl,-t and the linker will
tell you exactly which libraries.)  If that fails then finding the linker bug
will be easy.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to