------- Additional Comments From konrad dot schwarz at siemens dot com 2010-01-18 07:52 ------- Hm, perhaps this behavior was changed in the meantime.
The ld I am using reports: $ ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE 11.1) 2.19 Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. and I am quite certain that -e ENTRY does not imply -u ENTRY in this version (e.g., my problem went away after adding -u ENTRY to a linker line containing -e ENTRY). There is a case to be made that -e ENTRY should not imply -u ENTRY, namely, that there is already a defined fallback mechanism to determine the entry point (e.g., when ENTRY is not defined), also that `ENTRY' could be a number. Thus, unaware of PR 6766, I thought that it should be enough to add the note. PR 6755 is struck through in Bugzilla---does that mean it was rejected? If so, I would leave ld as it is and add the note to the documentation. This makes ld slightly more flexible and its options more orthogonal. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11178 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils