------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-03-05 12:24
-------
Subject: Re: Need representation of the offset from a label
to a GOT entry
Hi Niki,
> Since this relocation needs 2 parameters, it is difficult to represent as the
> normal relocation specification var(<relocation_type>). I propose the
> following
> syntax, which is similar to the syntax used to represent GOT table's
> relocation.
>
> .word var(GOTABS)-(.LPIC0+4)
I think that it would be clearer if the entire expression was enclosed
inside a single set of parentheses. Ie:
.word var(GOTABS-.LPIC0+4)
Allowing white space would make it easier to read as well:
.word var(GOTABS - .LPIC0 + 4)
Cheers
Nick
------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2010-03-05
20:14 -------
I disagree; var(GOTABS) is nicely parallel with var(GOT). It's even a sensible
relocation, although I don't think there's an assigned relocation number for it
(without the PREL part).
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11323
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
