http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869
Bug ID: 15869 Summary: nm --size-sort test fails for alpha-unknown-linux-gnuecoff Product: binutils Version: 2.24 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hp at sourceware dot org Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu Target: alpha-unknown-linux-gnuecoff Build HEAD for alpha-unknown-linux-gnuecoff (*not* alpha-linux-ecoff); just an ECOFF (or non-ELF) target. "make check-binutils" shows lots of failures, including: Running /home/hp/binutils/fixmmix0820/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/nm.exp ... Version /home/hp/binutils/fixmmix0820/obE/binutils/nm-new 2.23.52.20130820 FAIL: nm (no arguments) FAIL: nm -P FAIL: nm --size-sort The log for the --size-sort change shows: /home/hp/binutils/fixmmix0820/obE/binutils/nm-new --size-sort tmpdir/nm-1.o Executing on host: /home/hp/binutils/fixmmix0820/obE/binutils/nm-new --size-sort tmpdir/nm-1.o (timeout = 300) 00000008 T text_symbol2 0000000c T text_symbol1 0000000c T text_symbol3 00000008 T text_symbol2 0000000c T text_symbol1 0000000c T text_symbol3 FAIL: nm --size-sort Note the unexpected symbol values; a plain "./nm-new tmpdir/nm-1.o" shows: 00000000 T text_symbol1 0000000c T text_symbol2 00000014 T text_symbol3 A guess is that the symbol values are fouled up in the generic nm size-sort handler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils