https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #15 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > Hi Bernd, > > Actually here is a better patch. The previous one also affected non-code > weak symbols which was the wrong thing to do. > > Please try this patch out and let me know if you are happy with it. > > Cheers > Nick hmm... both variants of your patch do not affect x86_64, only 32-bit? can you give an example of these non-code weak symbols? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
