https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18836
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18836 > > --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- > (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #8) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) > > > (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #4) > > > > the extra sections contain "early" debug-info which gets refered to by > > > > LTRANS unit .debug_info. So it needs to be linked into the final > > > > executable / shared object and there get its mangled section name > > > > "unmangled". > > > > > > I think they should have different section names. I assume that > > > they can't be merged with normal .debug_xxx sections. > > > > On the contrary - they should be merged with the normal .debug_xxx sections > > emitted in the LTRANS assembly. The early-debug part of an example looks > > like > > Have you tried the debug_xxx.gnu.lto_ section name? That will merge with the FAT object part .debug_xxx which is not intended. It also does not share the property of .gnu.lto_* as being discarded by a non-LTO link via the default BFD linker script. Richard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
