https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030
--- Comment #2 from winter-...@bfw-online.de --- Your analysis is correct, thank you. While "-nostdlib" actually is a ld option (at least in my ld according to --help and man page), I rechecked and noticed I passed another gcc parameter "-no-enum-size-warning" to ld which seems to behave like "-n" as you suggested hence you can label this as user error but I keep wondering how this parameter handling could be useful/intended. The man page says "For options whose names are a single letter, option arguments must either follow the option letter without intervening whitespace, or be given as separate arguments immediately following the option that requires them." so "-no-enum-size-warning" would be taken as "-n" with value "o-enum-size-warning". Yet according to the man page "-n" does not take a value, so it seems the trailing characters will be silently discarded. Is this parameter-handling behavior intended this way? (Should one open a new bug to discuss that?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils