https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019
--- Comment #5 from glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> --- Hi Jose! (In reply to Jose E. Marchesi from comment #3) > So I think that the BFD check is pertinent and matches the ABI. Thank you very much for the analysis! So you'd say that this is indeed not a bug in binutils but gcc? If yes, I will try to pinpoint the gcc version which introduced the issue. I know, for fact, that systemd_215-5 does not have this isssue. @Frans: Could you fetch systemd_215-5 for sparc64 from snapshots.debian.org and extract libsystemd.so from it to attach it to this bug tracker? I'm currently sitting at the airport on my way to Japan and I only have my phone at the moment. systemd_215-5 was compiled with gcc-4.9 while 226-3 was compiled with gcc-5, so it might be a regression introduced with gcc-5. Again, thanks everyone for the help so far. I am currently working to bring Debian's sparc ports (both 32- and 64-bit), and I need your help to resolve any toolchain issues first. Adrian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils