https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19842
--- Comment #22 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> --- > Hmmm. Unless this was part of an attempt to preserve existing behavior while > moving from a separate hash table to using the new flags, it looks like an > unrelated change that was slipped into this patch without any comment or > justification. I hope Alan can remember what this was about (it's been > almost 5 years). There's this: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12696#c1 "...When we have a weakly defined symbol in an IR bfd, it isn't overridden by a weakly defined symbol in the real bfd, as per the usual behaviour of weak symbols...." That doesn't quite explain the patch, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils