https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20391
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Konrad,
> $ ar tv libarm_mp_startup.a
> rw-rw-rw- 0/0 18584 Jul 20 14:38 2016 startup.o
> $ arm-none-eabi-ar tv libarm_mp_startup.a
> rw-rw-rw- 0/0 18584 Jul 20 13:38 2016 startup.o
Assuming that the two programs were compiled from the same binutils source
code,
it is hard to see how this can be a binutils problem.
Since the (correctly working) ARM version of the tool was supplied by
Canonical,
however it may be that they have applied a patch that fixes the problem. If
so,
it would be worthwhile contacting them to find out detail of
thehttps://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ patch.
Otherwise all that I can think of is that the two tools are using different
versions of the cygwin dll, one of which has a fix for the timestamp problem
and one of which does not.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
