https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20499
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Tobias, > Now there's just the possible "num++" overflow on very large files left. > Could hit amd64 or i386 with large file support. It takes a huge symbol file > for that though. Right - and I think that other things would go wrong first. For example, I do not think that gprof is compiled with large file support enabled... So I have committed the revised patch. If you have any problems in this area, please let me know. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
