https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20803
--- Comment #2 from Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems dot org> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Created attachment 9623 [details] > Proposed patch Thank you for the quick turn around. > > Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it is enough to > solve the problem. > Yes, this solves the problem we are seeing. > I am not sure if this approach is the correct way to fix the issue, but it > does seem to be the simplest. As far as I can tell, the relocs in the > .eh_frame section can eb unaligned, so using R_SPARC_UA32 seems to be the > correct thing to do. I did look to see if I could enable > sparc_no_align_cons when fixing the output for the .eh_frame section, but I > could not find an easy way to do this. Hence I went for a hack based on the > section name. Not very subtle, but if it works then that is enough for now. I also had a look and felt any change was a potential issue for some other reason I would not be aware of. We will use this patch in RTEMS until the next binutils release. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
