https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828
--- Comment #14 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> --- Hi Maciej! (In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #12) > There's been no further feedback from other people and myself I haven't > made up my mind about this bug yet, so if you are blocked with your > work, then for the time being please use one of the proposals posted > here as a temporary workaround. The problem with this approach is that our toolchain maintainers are unwilling to merge a patch which has not been fully approved upstream for a supported target architecture. This means, the binutils package in Debian is still broken on all MIPS targets (mips32 big-endian, mips32 little-endian, mips64 little-endian) in Debian and if the issue is not resolved within the near future, the upcoming Debian Stretch release may be shipped without any official support for MIPS [1]. So, from the Debian point-of-view, fixing this bug has urgent priority unless we want to waive for MIPS support. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://release.debian.org/stretch/arch_qualify.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils