https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21368
--- Comment #4 from Budi <budikusasi at gmail dot com> --- don't laugh at me.. but I frankly don't understand the patch script, is it a kind of 'makefile' language ? What I have in mind now is just how to move our conversation to a forum that is heard and learnt by many more users, to be more benefit. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:19 PM, nickc at redhat dot com < sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21368 > > Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ---------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED > Last reconfirmed| |2017-04-11 > Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat > dot com > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- > Created attachment 9981 > --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9981&action=edit > Proposed patch > > Hi Budi, > > > on Windows 64bit by loading the source from Github, then after completing > > all Msys2 & Mingw64, > > A ha! I think that this is the clue. The mingw64 version of the linker > does > not support the --large-address-aware command line option because it is > already > large address aware. Ie you do not need an option to turn it on, and, more > significantly, you cannot use --disable-large-address-aware to turn it off. > > So... the problem is with the how your build is being configured. > Something is > addding the --large-address-aware option to the linker command line, when > it > really should not. > > I know how difficult it can be to track down and fix build configuration > problems however, so as an alternative I am uploading a small patch for > you to > try out. (Assuming that you are able to build your own version of the > linker). > This patch makes the mingw64 silently accept the --large-address-aware > option. > It does not do anything - there is nothing to be done - but at least now > the > linker will not complain about an unrecognised option. > > If you are able, please give this patch a test and let me know if it > solves the > problem for you. Alternatively you could track down the problem in your > configuration system and fix that. > > Cheers > Nick > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
