https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22840
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Unfortunately, unlike the #ld: lines in the *.?d files which can be > modified by setting options_regsub(ld) for perform the appropriate > substitution, this is not currently possible for the arg to > run_ld_link_tests. Can't we use a variable EMULATION or some such? > * To make some progress, I've hardcoded the Solaris values for now, which > leads me to the next issues: > > The file format lines in the *.?d files under test all hardcode elf32-sparc > or elf64-sparc, but should allow for elf32-sparc-sol2 (resp. > elf32-sparc.*). > > * Even with that fixed, there are many failures due to the fact that the > Solaris > ABI requires a couple of additional symbols (cf. emultempl/solaris2.em > (elf_solaris2_before_allocation), and those aren't currently expected in > the output. I'm uncertain how best to handle that: allow for a > postprocessing > step after readelf that removes those from the output or augment the > expected > output accordingly? It seems regexp_diff currently has no support for > optional or target-specific lines in the expected output. Can't we have specific *.?d files for Solaris? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils