https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22983
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
I am testing:
diff --git a/ld/plugin.c b/ld/plugin.c
index 259c18f3ff..4c806ee702 100644
--- a/ld/plugin.c
+++ b/ld/plugin.c
@@ -634,6 +634,7 @@ is_visible_from_outside (struct ld_plugin_symbol *lsym,
return TRUE;
if (blhe->non_ir_ref_dynamic
|| link_info.export_dynamic
+ || link_info.dynamic
|| bfd_link_dll (&link_info))
{
/* Check if symbol is hidden by version script. */
@@ -645,7 +646,8 @@ is_visible_from_outside (struct ld_plugin_symbol *lsym,
{
struct elf_link_hash_entry *el = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *)blhe;
int vis = ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (el->other);
- return vis == STV_DEFAULT || vis == STV_PROTECTED;
+ return ((el->dynamic || link_info.export_dynamic)
+ && (vis == STV_DEFAULT || vis == STV_PROTECTED));
}
/* On non-ELF targets, we can safely make inferences by considering
what visibility the plugin would have liked to apply when it first
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
