https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23997
--- Comment #4 from Ruslan Nikolaev <nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > (In reply to Ruslan Nikolaev from comment #2) > > Sometimes when the assembly code is for both PIC and non-PIC code, you may > > From x86-64 psAB: > > name@PLT: specifies the offset to the PLT entry of symbol name from the > current code > location. > > "name@PLT - ." has undefined behavior. Can you just use name@PLT for both > PIC and non-PIC codes? > It is possible but see below. > > want to use this construction. I checked LLVM/clang; it compiles correct > > output in both cases. > > This isn't relevant. I guess, I do not have a very strong opinion about that. But my concern is that the generated relocation is off by 4 which is not clear why; I discovered that by a mere chance. The LLVM behavior is probably more intuitive here but at the very least it would be good to error out rather than just silently generate an incorrect relocation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
