https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24993
Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2019-09-12
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm getting compiler bug reports from people using objdump -D, seeing invalid
code in the data section, and then assuming the compiler must be broken and
filing a bug report. This is causing trouble for me. I really need people to
stop using objdump -D unless they have a specific need for it. It is important
to get the message out to the RISC-V user community that using objdump -D is
wrong, and they should be using objdump -d instead. Unfortunately, I don't
know why so many people are using objdump -D instead of objdump -d. I suspect
some badly written documentation somewhere.
I agree that the objdump -D output could be improved. I'd be OK with this as
an enhancement request, but I'm not considering it a bug, as you shouldn't be
using objdump -D in the first place.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
