https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > We need a directive for SSE instructions without MMX registers. > > We can give it a different name, something like pure-SSE. > > But what practical use would such an option be? You said yourself that > anything that can engage MMX state in the CPU also is liable to want/need > access to EMMS (or FEMMS), which won't be accessible with just SSE insns > permitted. I want assembler to enforce assembly codes without any access to MMX state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
