https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
--- Comment #26 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #25) Hi Alan, > What do you think of this one, Nick? I like it. It is definitely a more robust solution to the original problem. > It's also possible to stuff the new > sort key into a new field of tdata.pe_obj_data for objects and > tdata.aout_ar_data->tdata for archives, but that's rather more messy. Agreed. I also think that we should keep part of my original patch - the part that makes bfd_set_filename() fail if the bfd has been closed by the file cache, and which also clears the cacheable flag on bfds which are renamed. Do you agree ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
