https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29559
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Hi Tom, > > [For the record the patch that introduced this bug was intended to fix PR > 29517]. > > > <0><100>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_unspecified_type) > > <0><101>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) > > OK, so you are saying that the DW_TAG_unspecified_type is in the wrong place > ? > Yes. > Presumably it should be after DW_TAG_subprogram. IE, something like this: > > <0><101>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) > <102> DW_AT_stmt_list : 0x123 > <106> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x4004ac > <10e> DW_AT_high_pc : 11 > <10f> DW_AT_name : test2.s > <113> DW_AT_comp_dir : /home/vries/gdb_versions/devel > <117> DW_AT_producer : GNU AS 2.39.50 > <11b> DW_AT_language : 32769 (MIPS assembler) > <1><11d>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_subprogram) > <11e> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x241): foo > <122> DW_AT_external : 1 > <122> DW_AT_type : <0x133> > <123> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x4004ac > <12b> DW_AT_high_pc : 11 > <1><133>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_unspecified_type) > > I will try to fix this. I originally placed the unspecified tag at the > start of the CU information because I found that I could not otherwise > compute the correct offset for it. I will just have to try harder. After the DW_TAG_compile_unit should also be fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
