https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29654
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Fangrui,
> `config.fatal_warnings = false;` makes me wonder how -w interacts with
> --fatal-warnings. It seems that -w --fatal-warnings and --fatal-warnings -w
> have the same effect (-w wins, which makes sense IMO), so I guess
> `config.fatal_warnings = false;` can be omitted.
It could, but I feel that it helps to emphasize that -w takes precedence over
--fatal-warnings, so I have left it in.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
