https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29764
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #3) > > Hi Christophe, > > > It seems your patch does the trick, but I imagined we'd want a more general > > solution (that is, do we want add such an optional prefix in all targets)? > > Oh it is supported for all targets, but only when the default cpu scan() > function is used. (See bfd/archures.c:bfd_default_scan). If the > architecture provides its own scan function, then this needs to support > the <arch>:<machine> syntax in order for it to work. (The AArch64 and ARM > architectures being obvious culprits in this case). Sorry, I wasn't aware of this feature, so that's a real bug in AArch64 and ARM implementations. > > That being said, doesn't adding such a prefix require updating some piece of > > documentation? > > Yes - you are right. We should update the documentation as well. Do you > want > to update the patch or shall I ? > Please go ahead :-) Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
