https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
--- Comment #8 from Sam James <sam at gentoo dot org> --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #7) > On 2023-08-08 3:33 p.m., sam at gentoo dot org wrote: > > Thanks Dave, I've done that last night in > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/871qgdto5m....@gentoo.org/T/#m0f16fd340d16e17949f2153309606b0918d0b926. > I think the xfail and notarget comments were written as they were so they > didn't match hppa64. I haven't yet got a testing setup for hppa64 (we have a package for it, obviously, for building kernels, but I haven't tried to build it manually yet) but I can revert my commits and replace with an explicit hppa1.1 and hppa2.0 if you prefer. But personally I'm not that focused on hppa64 just yet until we have the userland stuff more figured out. Whatever you prefer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
